Opponents of a proposed rock crusher facility (pictured here Sept. 30) on U.S. 281 just south of Marble Falls are planning a second weekend of protests Oct. 7-8 at the intersection of 281 and CR 403 to express concerns about what they believe is an air quality issue should the operation move forward. Courtesy photo
STAFF WRITER CONNIE SWINNEY
AUSTIN — Opponents of two rock crusher permits in Burnet County have raised concerns about air quality connected to a substance called crystalline silica, but industry advocates scoff at their claims, saying the science does not support fears about pollution.
“We have way more than enough quarries,” said Grant Dean, a construction company owner and co-organizer of the newly created Highland Lakes Clean Air group.
“(The mining industry have) all been kicked out of Travis County, Austin, and Bee Cave, so instead of being around there, they’re coming here and inundating us with the toxic dust,” Dean said.
As many as a half-dozen mines and rock crushing facilities as well as several concrete-based plants currently operate in Burnet County.
Dean and his group contend the substance crystalline silica is “polluting” the air and causing a health risk due to the growing mining-based industry.
“This is dolomite. It’s not just limestone. It runs in veins (or strata) in the (mined) rock,” said Dean of the land where Asphalt Inc. is attempting to operate. “There’ll be up to five percent of crystalline silica in the dust that is released.
“Crystalline silica is a definite proven carcinogen causing lung cancer,” he added.
According to the National Cancer Institute, crystalline silica is an abundant natural material found in stone, soil, and sand as well as concrete, brick, and mortar. Crystalline silica from quarry is “respirable,” meaning people can breath it in. When inhaled, according to the NCI, the particles can penetrate deep into a person’s lungs.
On the other side of the debate, mining advocates say fears about the quartz-based substance lack a “fact-based argument.”
“They’re mining limestone. Limestone is calcium carbonate in which silica is a very low percentage,” Szecsy said. “The threat that they’re alleging is at a greater degree when you’re mining silica sand.”
Szecsy added that such issues plague those who mine materials like sand in places such as West Texas or those who work closely with quartz-based products such as tile cutters.
“That person has a greater risk of silica exposure than someone living in a community surrounding a limestone quarry,” he said.